Visions of Restoration in Fire-Adapted Forest Landscapes: Lessons from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
Title | Visions of Restoration in Fire-Adapted Forest Landscapes: Lessons from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Authors | Urgenson, LS |
Secondary Authors | Ryan, CM |
Tertiary Authors | Halpern, CB |
Subsidiary Authors | Bakker, JD, Belote, RT, Franklin, JF, Haugo, RD, Nelson, CR, Waltz, AEM |
Journal | Environmental Management |
Volume | 59 |
Start Page | 338 |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | CFLRP, collaboration, Desired conditions, ecological restoration, Fire-prone forests, Public lands management, technical reports and journal articles |
Abstract | Collaborative approaches to natural resource management are becoming increasingly common on public lands. Negotiating a shared vision for desired conditions is a fundamental task of collaboration and serves as a foundation for developing management objectives and monitoring strategies. We explore the complex socio-ecological processes involved in developing a shared vision for collaborative restoration of fire-adapted forest landscapes. To understand participant perspectives and experiences, we analyzed interviews with 86 respondents from six collaboratives in the western U.S., part of the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program established to encourage collaborative, science-based restoration on U.S. Forest Service lands. Although forest landscapes and group characteristics vary considerably, collaboratives faced common challenges to developing a shared vision for desired conditions. Three broad categories of challenges emerged: meeting multiple objectives, collaborative capacity and trust, and integrating ecological science and social values in decision-making. Collaborative groups also used common strategies to address these challenges, including some that addressed multiple challenges. These included use of issue-based recommendations, field visits, and landscape-level analysis; obtaining support from local agency leadership, engaging facilitators, and working in smaller groups (sub-groups); and science engagement. Increased understanding of the challenges to, and strategies for, developing a shared vision of desired conditions is critical if other collaboratives are to learn from these efforts. |
DOI | 10.1007/s00267-016-0791-2 |