'Put the wet stuff on the hot stuff': The legacy and drivers of conflict surrounding wildfire suppression

Existing research demonstrates that wildfire events can lead to conflict among local residents and outside professionals involved in wildfire management or suppression. What has been missing in the
wildfire literature is a more explicit understanding of the social dynamics that influence such conflict in rural or agricultural communities and their long-term legacy for future wildfire management. Authors
conducted interviews with local residents of a southeastern Washington community in 2012 to better understand conflict surrounding management of the 2006 Columbia Complex Fire. We utilize structuration
theory to demonstrate how conflict stemmed from differences in the norms characterizing the local community and the established practices of outside firefighters, the inability of these two populations
to communicate in a way that established shared meanings for values at risk, and local residents' desire to contribute to suppression efforts rather that give up complete control to outside resources. The
legacy of conflict during the Columbia Complex fire included increased distrust of externally based fire response and entrenched views about locals' right to protect their property. We conclude by discussing
the need to account for the legacy of conflict during future wildfire events and the reasons such conflict are likely in rural or agricultural communities.