Catchment-scale stream temperature response to land disturbance by wildfire governed by surface–subsurface energy exchange and atmospheric controls

TitleCatchment-scale stream temperature response to land disturbance by wildfire governed by surface–subsurface energy exchange and atmospheric controls
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsWagner, MJ
Secondary AuthorsBladon, KD
Tertiary AuthorsSilins, U
Subsidiary AuthorsWilliams, CHS, Martens, AM, Boon, S, MacDonald, RJ, Stone, M, Emelko, MB, Anderson, A
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume517
Start Page328
Keywordsforest disturbance, stream temperature, technical reports and journal articles, wildfire and water
Abstract

In 2003, the Lost Creek wildfire severely burned 21,000 hectares of forest on the eastern slopes of the
Canadian Rocky Mountains. Seven headwater catchments with varying levels of disturbance (burned,
post-fire salvage logged, and unburned) were instrumented as part of the Southern Rockies Watershed
Project to measure streamflow, stream temperature, and meteorological conditions. From 2004 to
2010 mean annual stream temperature (Ts) was elevated 0.8–2.1 [1]C in the burned and post-fire salvage
logged streams compared to the unburned streams. Mean daily maximum Ts was 1.0–3.0 [1]C warmer
and mean daily minimum Ts was 0.9–2.8 [1]C warmer in the burned and post-fire salvage logged streams
compared to the unburned catchments. The effects of wildfire on the thermal regime of the burned catchments were persistent and trend analysis showed no apparent recovery during the study period. Temporal patterns of Ts were strongly associated with seasonal variability of surface and groundwater
interactions and air temperature. Advective heat fluxes between groundwater and surface water were
likely the dominant controls on Ts, though the strength of these advective controls varied among catchments highlighting the importance of simultaneous catchment-scale and process-focused research to better elucidate the physical drivers influencing Ts response to disturbance.

DOI10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.006